A short abbreviated list of persecutions endured by Christians in the last 1,000 years:
Due to persecution, Christians were martyrs under 11th century Egypt-Syria 12th century Almohad 13th century Persia 14th century Tamerlane 15th century Turks 16th 17th century Japan 18th 19th century France 20th 21th century Armenia Russia Palestine Poland Germany China Cuba Sudan India Iraq etc.
Let it be noted emphatically that Christians follow the example of the Theban Legion and do not reply to this by warfare. The current Anglo-American invasion of the Middle East (including especially all of its militarist and political support for the criminal genocidal racist apartheid murderous robber state of foxes known as "Israel") is not justified by anything and in particular not by the blood of the martyrs.
See the article on the Janissaries below, the attitude behind which was one of the principle corruptions of the Turkish Ottoman Empire. The Turkish Ottoman empire replaced the Sultanate of Rum. What the Ottoman Empire did to the Christian children was a direct violation of Islamic Qur'anic law which always upheld the protection of Christians from the time of Muhammad and the Ummah (Muslim community - which from the time of Muhammad on has been plagued by the Jews' subversions and instigations and perversions) then and onward. That same attitude in the Ottomans led to the adoption of the vile total Anti-Christian and Anti-Islam absolute Antichrist, Dajjal, Frankist Doenmeh into the heart of the Ottoman Empire's religious life - they imbibed sheer poison - it is also in every way the branch extending from this earlier root:
Persian heresy in Islam and its power play to implement the Antichrist
Persian cabalistic-Gnostic heresy within Islamic civilization goes back to the time of the Hurufi movement in Persia in the eighth century A.D. from within the Imami. It is the absolute basis of the Ismaeli heresy which has totally corrupted Egypt and Saudia Arabia down to the present. From Persia it spread to Turkey and became the Bektasiyya, who were totally immersed in Jewish Kabbalah. Centuries later Sabbatai Zvi was received there in Turkey by the Persian Shi'ite Muslim Bektasiyya, which predisposed the Sultan of Turkey to receiving and becoming the patron of Sabbatai Zvi. This led to Sabbateanism. The original, and still the core heresy and movement, is Persian-Iranian Shi'ism. It is the basis for ALL Zionism for the last 12 centuries. It is the Sephardic Zionist core and is who entrapped the Khazar Ashkenazim into Talmudic Judaism. When you speak of Iran, you are talking about the absolute basis and rulers of the synagogue who control all of Zionist Israel. There are more Rabbis in Iran than in most Jewish enclaves in the world.
[Sufism was corrupted every which way by this and the final outgrowth of that was Al Qaeda]
This Persian Jew subversion and murderous intrigue dates from the time of the Persian Empire at the time of the Roman Empire. During the first centuries of the spread of the Gospel from Jerusalem and from there throughout the world - it was the Jews in both the Roman Empire and in the Persian Empire which instigated the ruling classes to unjustly and unlawfully persecute the Christians in each Empire - the Jews also caused the theological divisions between East and West - a pattern which which the Jews continued in their instigation of division between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches during especially the time of Photius a Khazar Jew who was Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople in the 9th century A.D. Today that particular pattern of Photius is seen in the Jews' Kahal-Haburah control over Russia extending from Czarist times through Communist times to presently in their use of Drozdov (meaning "blackbird," KGB-Mossad name of Alexius II, their agent who posed as the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church). The whole "Third Rome" apostasy of the Russian Church was Jew instigated and on purpose.
Note on the the Jews' Russian Black Mariah/Cheka/NKVD/GPU/KGB/FSB-FSS (Military core GRU directorate) offspring, the Mossad. The Mossad is the child of the Russian Secret Intelligence, it is not the CIA's offspring and not MI5/6's offspring. Both OSS/CIA and MI5/6 are the offspring of Russian Secret Intelligence as well. Russian Secret Intelligence dates back to the Czarist secret service. The Jews' instigators and saboteurs in Russia are the parent of the Russian Secret Intelligence - they were the AIPAC of Czarist Russia. A copy of all of this in Germany was the Prussian secret service which was the base, later, for the Nazi GESTAPO.
The Keraites, Persian Jews in 800 A.D. who surreptitiously invaded the Holy Land then, are not nor have they ever been Moses' Torah only Jews - they have been totally hidden Kabbalistic Satanists the whole time.
This was all planned by the Kahal-Haburah to destroy all of sovereign rule of all nations including the Sultanate of Rum (ended 1300 A.D.) and be the absolute corruption of all of the nations and including Turkish Society. It led to the complete destruction of the Ottoman Empire in 1915 and the rise of an Antichrist, Kemal Mustafa Attaturk, actually a Jew and Freemason and member of the Doenmeh - literally Satanists all. All of it was organized by the Jews, the Haburah - the Kahal. All of this was and is the prime (modern in the sense of the last seven centuries) movement in the North of the Region variously known as the Levant and the Fertile Crescent. The Region is the Holy Land and the surrounding region. To the North is Anatolia. Anatolia (called Asia Minor in the West) is directly and unequivocally the land of Gog (King Gyges originally) and Magog (Lydia at the time of Gyges who was King of Lydia then) – which is exactly the original Biblical Scriptural Reference to the Antichrist, the false ha maschiach of the Jews, the Dajjal, and its nation of antichrists. What the Jews' Kahal-Haburah did was to, via their usurious banking in the West (linked to the Phanar district in Constantinople) and its influence in Venice and the Vatican, instigate an alliance made in hell between the Christian West and the Sephardic Jews' vassal state of Khazaria; that, both the usurious Jew banking and the Khazarian alliance, poisoned forevermore all ecclesiastical hierarchy
in the West.
The recent comment by Putin to not worry about Iran, Israel will take care of Iran, means exactly that, Israel will continue to nurture Iran as its parent in the region.
The Russian Kahal is the direct outgrowth of the Turkish Jews, which from the North, meaning Russia in 1915, came back to collect their investment in Turkey.
See also: God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: Hidden History of Zionism
Janissaries From: The 1911 Classic Encyclopedia – Based on the 11
th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (pub. 1911) http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Janissaries
JANISSARIES (corrupted from Turkish
yeni cheri, new troops), an organized military force constituting until 1826 the standing army of the
Ottoman empire. At the outset of her history
Turkey possessed no standing army. All Moslems capable of bearing arms served as a kind of volunteer
yeomanry known as
akinjis; they were summoned by public criers, or, if the occasion required it, by secret messengers. It was under Orkhan that a regular paid army was first organized: the soldiers were known as
yaya or
piyade. The result was unsatisfactory, as the Turcomans, from whom these troops were recruited, were unaccustomed to fight on foot or to submit to military discipline. Accordingly in 1330, on the advice of Chendereli Kara Khalil, the system known as
devshurme or forced
levy, was adopted, whereby a certain number of Christian youths (at first 1000) were every year taken from their parents and, after undergoing a period of
apprenticeship, were enrolled as
yeni cheri or new troops. The
venerable saint Haji Bektash, founder of the Bektashi dervishes, blessed the corps and promised them victory; he remained ever after the patron saint of the janissaries.
At first the corps was exclusively recruited by the forced levy of Christian children, for which purpose the officer known as
tournaji-bashi, or head-keeper of the
cranes, made periodical
tours in the provinces. The fixed organization of the corps dates only from Mahommed II., and its regulations were subsequently modified by
Suleiman I. In early days all Christians were enrolled indiscriminately; later those from
Albania, Bosnia and
Bulgaria were preferred. The recruits while serving their apprenticeship were instructed in the principles of the faith by
khojas, but according to D'Ohsson (vii. 327) they were not obliged to become Moslems.
The entire corps, commanded by the
aga of the janissaries, was known as the
ojak (hearth); it was divided into
ortas or units of varying numbers; the
oda (room) was the name given to the
barracks in which the janissaries were lodged. There were, after the reorganization of Suleiman I., 196 ortas of three classes, viz. the
jemaat, comprising 101 ortas, the
beuluk, 61 ortas, and the
sekban, or
seimen, 34 ortas; to these must be added 34 ortas of
ajami or apprentices. The strength of the orta varied greatly, sometimes being as low as loo, sometimes rising considerably beyond its nominal war strength of Soo. The distinction between the different classes seems to have been principally in name; in theory the jemaat, or
yaya beiler, were specially charged with the duty of frontier-guards; the
beuluks had the privilege of serving as the sultan's guards and of keeping the sacred banner in their custody.
Until the accession of
Murad III. (1574) the total effective of the janissaries, including the ajami or apprentices, did not exceed 20,000. In 1582 irregularities in the mode of admission to the ranks began. Soon parents themselves begged to have their children enrolled, so great were the privileges attaching to the corps; later the privilege of enlistment was restricted to the children or relatives of former janissaries; eventually the regulations were much relaxed, and any person was admitted, only negroes being excluded. In 1591 the ojak numbered 48,688 men. Under Ibrahim (1640-1648) it was reduced by
Kara Mustafa to 17,000; but it soon
rose again, and at the accession of Mahommed IV. (1648), the accession-bakshish was distributed to 50,000 Janissaries. During the war of1683-1698the rules for admission were suspended, 30,000 recruits being received at one time, and the effective of the corps rising to 70,000; about 1805 it numbered more than 112,000; it went on increasing until the destruction of the janissaries, when it reached 135,000. It would perhaps be more correct to say that these are the numbers figuring on the pay-sheets, and that they doubtless largely exceed the total of the men actually serving in the ranks.
Promotion to the rank of
warrant officer was obtained by long or distinguished service; it was by seniority up to the rank of
odabashi, but odabashis were promoted to the rank of
chorbaji (commander of an orta) solely by selection. Janissaries advanced in their own orta, which they left only to assume the command of another. Ortas remained permanently stationed in the fortress towns in which they were in
garrison, being displaced in time of peace only when some violent animosity broke out between two companies. There were usually 12 in garrison at
Belgrade, 14 at
Khotin, 16 at Widdin, 20 at
Bagdad, &c. The commander was frequently changed. A new chorbaji was usually appointed to the command of an orta stationed at a frontier post; he was then transferred elsewhere, so that in course of time he passed through different provinces.
In time of peace the janissary received no pay. At first his war pay was limited to one aspre per diem, but it was eventually raised to a minimum of three aspres, while veterans received as much as 29 aspres, and retired officers from 30 to 120. The aga received 24,000 piastres per annum; the ordinary pay of a commander was 120 aspres per diem. The aga and several of his subordinates received a percentage of the pay and
allowance of the troops; they also inherited the property of deceased janissaries. Moreover, the officers profited largely by retaining the names of dead or fictitious janissaries on the pay-rolls. Rations of mutton,
bread and candles were furnished by the government, the supply of
rice,
butter and vegetables being at the charge of the commandant. The rations would have been entirely inadequate if the janissaries had not been allowed, contrary to the regulations, to pursue different callings, such as those of baker,
butcher, glazier, boatman, &c. At first the janissaries bore no other distinctive
mark save the white felt cap. Soon the red cap with
gold embroidery was substituted. Later a uniform was introduced, of which the distinctive mark was less the colour than the cut of the coat and the shape of the head-
dress and
turban. The only distinction in the
costume of commanding officers was in the colour of their boots, those of the beuluks being red while the others were yellow; subordinate officers wore black boots.
The fundamental laws of the janissaries, which were very early infringed, were as follows: implicit obedience to their officers; perfect
accord and union among themselves;
abstinence from luxury, extravagance and practices unseemly for a soldier and a brave man; observance of the rules of Haji Bektash and of the religious law; exclusion from the ranks of all save those properly levied; special rules for the infliction of the death penalty; promotion to be by seniority; janissaries to be admonished or punished by their own officers only; the infirm and unfit to be pensioned; janissaries were not to let their beards grow, not to marry, nor to leave their barracks, nor to engage in trade; but were to spend their time in
drill and in practising the arts of war.
In time of peace the state supplied no arms, and the janissaries on service in the capital were armed only with clubs; they were forbidden to carry any arm save a
cutlass, the only exception being at the frontier-posts. In time of war the janissaries provided their own arms, and these might be any which took their fancy. However, they were induced by rivalry to procure the best obtainable and to keep them in perfect order. The banner of the janissaries was of white
silk on which verses from the
Koran were embroidered in gold. This banner was planted beside the aga's
tent in camp, with four other flags in red cases, and his three
horse-tails. Each orta had its
flag, half-red and half-yellow, placed before the tent of its commander. Each orta had two or three great caldrons used for boiling the soup and pilaw; these were under the guard of subordinate officers. A particular superstition attached to them: if they were lost in battle all the officers were disgraced, and the orta was no longer allowed to
parade with its caldrons in public ceremonies. The janissaries were stationed in most of the guard-houses of
Constantinople and other large towns. No sentries were on duty, but rounds were sent out two or three times a day. It was customary for the
sultan or the grand
vizier to bestow largess on an orta which they might visit.
The janissaries conducted themselves with extreme violence and brutality towards civilians. They extorted money from them on every possible pretext: thus, it was their duty to sweep the streets in the immediate vicinity of their barracks, but they forced the civilians, especially if rayas, to perform this task or to pay a bribe. They were themselves subject to severe
corporal punishments; if these were to take place publicly the ojak was first asked for its consent.
At first a source of strength to Turkey as being the only wellorganized and disciplined force in the country, the janissaries soon became its bane, thanks to their lawlessness and exactions. One frequent means of exhibiting their discontent was to set fire to Constantinople; 140 such fires are said to have been caused during the 28 years of Ahmed III.'s reign. The janissaries were at all times distinguished for their want of respect towards the sultans; their outbreaks were never due to a real desire for reforms of abuses or of misgovernment, but were solely caused to obtain the downfall of some
obnoxious minister.
The first recorded revolt of the janissaries is in 1443, on the occasion of the second accession of Mahommed II., when they broke into rebellion at
Adrianople. A similar revolt happened at his death, when
Bayazid II. was forced to yield to their demands and thus the custom of the accession-bakshish was established; at the end of his reign it was the janissaries who forced Bayazid to summon Prince
Selim and to hand over the reins of power to him. During the Persian campaign of Selim I. they mutinied more than once. Under
Osman II. their disorders reached their greatest height and led to the dethronement and
murder of the sultan. It would be tedious to recall all their acts of insubordination. Throughout Turkish history they were made use of as instruments by unscrupulous and ambitious statesmen, and in the 17th century they had become a praetorian guard in the worst sense of the word. Sultan
Selim III. in despair endeavoured to organize a properly drilled and disciplined force, under the name of
nizam-i jedid, to take their place; for some time the janissaries regarded this attempt in sullen silence; a curious detail is that Napoleon's ambassador Sebastiani strongly dissuaded the sultan from taking this step. Again serving as tools, the janissaries dethroned Selim III. and obtained the abolition of the nizam-i-jedid. But after the successful revolution of Bairakdar
Pasha of Widdin the new troops were reestablished and drilled: the resentment of the janissaries rose to such a height that they attacked the grand vizier's house, and after destroying it marched against the sultan's palace. They were repulsed by
cannon, losing 600 men in the affair (1806). But such was the excitement and alarm caused at Constantinople that the nizam-i-jedid, or
sekbans as they were now called, had to be suppressed. During the next 20 years the misdeeds and turbulence of the janissaries knew no bounds. Sultan
Mahmud II., powerfully impressed by their violence and lawlessness at his accession, and with the example of Mehemet Ali's method of suppressing the Mamlukes before his eyes, determined to rid the state of this
scourge; long biding his time, in 1825 he decided to form a corps of regular drilled troops known as
eshkenjis. A
fetva was obtained from the
Sheikh-ul-
Islam to the effect that it was the duty of Moslems to acquire military science. The imperial
decree announcing the formation of the new troops was promulgated at a grand council, and the high dignitaries present (including certain of the principal officers of the janissaries who concurred) undertook to comply with its provisions. But the janissaries rose in revolt, and on the 10th of June 1826, began to collect on the Et Meidan square at Constantinople; at mid-. night they attacked the house of the aga of janissaries, and, finding he had made good his escape, proceeded to overturn the caldrons of as many ortas as they could find, thus forcing the troops of those ortas to join the insurrection. Then they pillaged and robbed throughout the town. Meanwhile the government was collecting its forces; the
ulema, consulted by the sultan, gave the following fetva: "If unjust and violent men attack their brethren, fight against the aggressors and send them before their natural
judge !" On this the sacred standard of the prophet was unfurled, and war was formally declared against these disturbers of order. Cannon were brought against the Et Meidan, which was surrounded by troops. Ibrahim Aga, known as Kara Jehennum, the commander of the
artillery, made a last appeal to the janissaries to surrender; they refused, and fire was opened upon them. Such as escaped were shot down as they fled; the barracks where many found refuge were burnt; those who were taken prisoner were brought before the grand vizier and hanged. Before many days were over the corps had ceased to exist, and the janissaries, the
glory of Turkey's early days and the scourge of the country for the last two centuries, had passed for ever from the
page of her history.
See M. d'Ohsson,
Tableaux de l'empire ottoman (Paris, 1787-1820); Ahmed Vefyk,
Lehje-i-osmanie (Constantinople, 1290-1874); A. Djevad
Bey,
Etat militaire ottoman(Constantinople, 1885).
